OAA-led amendments reflected in Toronto’s harmonized zoning bylaw


Ontario Construction News staff writer

After nearly a decade, the Ontario Association of Architects (OAA) says it is pleased the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) has released its final order regarding amendments to the residential provisions of the Toronto Citywide Zoning Bylaw 569-2013.

Originally passed in 2010, the bylaw sought to harmonize approaches across the amalgamated Toronto regions, but was repealed in May 2011, pending a need for consultation and amendments.

The OAA’s Harmonized Zoning Bylaw Task Group, including architects whose practices represented new construction and renovation work for diverse clients across Toronto neighbourhoods, pushed for meaningful change to the flaws inherent in the law. A new version was released in 2013, however, after several OAA recommendations remained absent, the association filed an appeal.

The decision came just days after the passage of the contentious Bill 23, More Housing Built Faster Act, and, for its part, can contribute to housing affordability in Toronto. Affordability, housing choice, and character preservation are key issues underpinning the suggested amendments tabled by the OAA, which regulates architecture to protect the public interest.

OAA’s task force was focused on encouraging the amendment of the bylaw to foster the goals of Toronto’s official plan of ensuring housing choices are available for all people in their communities at all stages of their lives, while respecting and reinforcing the character of neighborhoods.

A March 2018 decision on the case said the main concern was “whether a development permitted through the Bylaw would conform to policies in the Official Plan” and “whether the provisions of the bylaw would permit appropriate and acceptable development”.

Ultimately, LPAT ruled the bylaw did not uphold the goals of the Official Plan.

Due to the OAA’s appeal, the following changes have been made:

  • Walk-out basements, as well as non-habitable basements and attics of some existing homes, no longer count as “gross floor area;”
  • Coverings over rear terraces no longer count as lot coverage;
  • Modest rear porches or terraces are permitted without penalty;
  • The ability to provide parking on small lots was improved, and the requirement for a parking space is waived where one is not possible (e.g. narrow lots);
  • The ability to continue to build the wide variety of roof shapes found in established neighborhoods was preserved, including lessening restrictions on gabled roofs and dormers; and
  • Reductions of house height made within all former City of Toronto neighbourhoods have been partially reversed.

When Toronto originally adopted the revised harmonized zoning bylaw in 2013, many architects were alarmed at its impact on what could be built, explains Jim Pfeffer, Toronto architect and member of the OAA task group.

“Architects noticed immediately the increased complexity of the zoning rules, and the way in which the new rules restricted the design options available to them and their clients, funneling new home design into a cookie-cutter form,” he said. “The new rules also affected the ability to renovate existing houses, making basement space in older homes—which did not meet code requirements for habitability—count as floor area, or by making the roofline of even modest existing homes non-compliant.”

The OAA says the decision is timely.

“It not only removes complexities from the development approval process in the city, but it also mitigates the creation of new restrictions on housing typologies.”.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

I accept the Privacy Policy

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.